The election is over, but Trump doesn't want to give in. He is now relying on the help of the courts. The US is threatened with a restless hangover - but the result seems pretty certain.
It will be more than two months before Joe Biden's planned assumption of office in January. A lot can happen until then - and if President Donald Trump had his way, the courts would intervene until then to prevent Biden's entry into the White House.
What role does the judiciary play?
In the USA, complaints are always made quickly and a lot. In the vast majority of election years, when a candidate had a good head start, a lawsuit or two couldn't affect the outcome of the election.
In addition, courts cannot rule on the outcome of the election itself, not even the Supreme Court in Washington, Supreme Court.
How realistic is Trump's hope?
If Biden's election victory depended on a narrow result in one state or two states, Trump might still have a chance.
A judgment in his favor to allow some votes or the legality of deadlines and voting procedures could theoretically overturn the result in a very tight state such as Georgia. The same applies to a recounting of votes, which is required in some places.
In the race to secure the necessary majority of 270 voters, Biden is now so far ahead of Trump that one or two successful lawsuits shouldn't matter.
If contrary to expectations, Biden should lose a state because of a judgment or a recount, he would still have a sufficient lead over Trump based on the current status of the count. According to forecasts, he should ultimately secure around 300 votes.Why is Pennsylvania so important?
The most dangerous thing for Biden would be to lose Pennsylvania to a legal battle. It is the largest controversial state that has 20 electorates to allocate.
Trump's lawyers are therefore likely to make special efforts to protect the state. Among other things, they hope to challenge the result before the Supreme Court.
Specifically, a lawsuit is pending there against an extension of the deadline for sending postal voting documents due to the corona pandemic.
The Supreme Court did not overturn the extension immediately before the election but reserved the right to negotiate the case in more detail after the vote.
State Secretary Kathy Boockvar, who was responsible for conducting the election in Pennsylvania, said that postal ballot papers received after Election Day would be counted separately because of the lawsuit. It is about a few thousand votes that should hardly make a difference, she said.
Doesn't Trump have the Supreme Court in his pocket?
Trump has the home advantage at the Supreme Court: six of the nine-lifetime judges are considered conservative, three of whom the Republicans nominated himself. Some complaints about the election had already landed with the judges before the vote, mostly about quite technical questions.
One issue was, for example, whether a deadline for accepting ballots can be changed by a court or only by the parliament of the state concerned. In the judges' decisions, there was no clear tendency towards party membership. The conservative judge Amy Coney Barrett, who was only appointed at the end of October, abstained from voting on several decisions.
But weren't there any cases of electoral fraud?
Trump repeatedly complains about "massive election fraud". Trump is angry that his election victory will be "stolen" and that he can only lose because of the dark machinations of the Democrats. But despite all the angry allegations, Trump has so far provided no evidence other than hearsay, so it should hardly have a chance in court.
Could recounts change the results?
The right to vote in the USA is determined individually by each state, so there are also different regulations for recounts. Usually, votes are re-counted when the result is extremely close or, for example, requested by a narrowly inferior candidate.
Trump is likely to seek a recount in Wisconsin, Georgia, and possibly Pennsylvania as well. Biden's lead should be a maximum of 0.5 percentage points.
In the past, the results of recounts in the states have changed only marginally. For example, four years ago in Wisconsin, at the request of a losing candidate, all votes were counted anew: The election winner Trump increased his lead over Democrat Hillary Clinton by 131 votes.
0 Comments